It's been just about a year since I wrote that post about IF Richard Armitage was gay, what's it got to do with us ? This has since become the most read and the most commented post on this blog, for better or for worse. Hotly debated issue, apparently. The thing that strikes me is how people look upon the subject. A lot of comments were very supportive, saying if he was gay, it might spoil the illusion somewhat, but all in all, if that's who he is, then that's who he is. Others claimed to have evidence of him being a homosexual, but from what I gather, it's really only based on hearsay, rumourmongering and/or "gut feelings". Personally, I'd be interested to hear a gay man's views on this. Why? Because everyone in the debate is female, and the vast majority, if not all, are straight. Ever heard the term "gaydar"? Whose gaydar is more likely to be accurate - a straight female's or a homosexual male's? I know who I'd vote for...
Oh gosh, me either. This is gonna be SO GOOD. :)
ReplyDeleteYup. Me too!
ReplyDeleteBut my 6-yr old niece will have to wait a few years I think...I looks really scary!
That was supposed to be IT looks scary (not I look scary ;))
ReplyDeleteLOL! I'm sure you don't look scary at all, calexora. :)
ReplyDeleteThe end is finally here.... Hopefully if it is as good as part 1 was... this is going to be an absolute cracker!!!!
ReplyDelete