Lost Sean Connery period drama resurfaces

-
"Da shvedanya, Mish Karenina ...
The name'sh Wronski, count Wronski.
And you do have a lishenshe to shwoon."

For the love of all things ancient – look at what cropped up on BBC News today! An adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina has been re-discovered in the BBC archives and will be released on DVD in September. First broadcast in early November 1961, the Russian drama featured a young Sean Connery and Claire Bloom – who starred together in Bond flick Dr. No a year later apparently. No cravat on the picture, but Sean Connery in a uniform – oooh.

Source: Sean Connery BBC period drama rediscovered
Publish Post

Comments

  1. Unknown19 August 2010 at 16:12

    How fun! Looking forward to the chance to see this one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Phylly319 August 2010 at 17:59

    I had heard that Connery had played Count Vronsky. I would enjoy seeing this. I have always admired Claire Bloom too.
    I saw the adaptation with Sean Bean last night. It was very good!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Starheart19 August 2010 at 23:56

    I'd love to see that. My first taste of russian literature.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Traxy20 August 2010 at 09:45

    The only classic Russian literature I've been exposed to is Dr. Zhivago, and that was in the miniseries remake from 2002(?)... and that was only because of Sam Neill playing Victor Komarovsky - but oh, he does it so well. Creepy yet dashingly delicious git! <3

    @Phylly: Oooh, magic word: Sean Bean! :D (Guessing his Russian count sounded a lot like he was from Sheffield? *giggle*) I've begun watching Crusoe and it's nice how they've matched up adult Crusoe and Bean (Crusoe's dad), because they do look similar, so you can believe they're father and son! Just a shame the DVD cover boasts both Sean Bean and Sam Neill - and so far, the series has only had very brief encounters with either actor - flashbacks from Crusoe's childhood. But it's about 4-5 discs in total and I've only seen the first one so far, so fingers crossed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for stopping by! All comments are read (usually within 24 hours) and responded to whenever I can, but not necessarily straight away. Spam comments stop in the moderation queue. Be as snarky as you like, but I give as good as I get, and you probably need a hug. Cheerio! :)

Popular posts from this blog

You know you're a Richard Armitage fan when ...

-
I thought there should be a list like this. Maybe there already is, I've just not seen it yet. It's not a massive list by the time of posting this (25 points), but I'm hoping you'll help me come up with more so that one day it will be. :) Last updated: 14 June 2012, the list so far: You know you're a Richard Armitage fan when ...
READ MORE »

Richard Armitage will never be himself on TV

-
Image
One of the interesting comments Richard Armitage was when an interviewer asked him, because he's a great dancer, is if we'd ever see him on something like Strictly Come Dancing . His response was that we'd never get to see Richard Armitage as Richard Armitage on TV. Basically, he's not the kind of celebrity to show up as soon as someone waves an invite to a reality TV show. Richard Armitage as himself. On telly. But not in a reality show. Things that make me love and respect the man: +1! Before I read that interview, I was thinking about him on Strictly , and then started to think of a host of other reality TV shows and whether or not he would be a suitable candidate. This is what I came up with ... Top Gear What it is: This is a car show, or ... a comedy show with cars in, depending on how you look at it. Rupert Penry-Jones and Peter Firth came on it to promote series 7 (?) of Spooks , so why not Richard Armitage? He does drive a car, after all ... Why ...
READ MORE »

And you call yourself a Richard Armitage fan?

-
It's been just about a year since I wrote that post about IF Richard Armitage was gay, what's it got to do with us ? This has since become the most read and the most commented post on this blog, for better or for worse. Hotly debated issue, apparently. The thing that strikes me is how people look upon the subject. A lot of comments were very supportive, saying if he was gay, it might spoil the illusion somewhat, but all in all, if that's who he is, then that's who he is. Others claimed to have evidence of him being a homosexual, but from what I gather, it's really only based on hearsay, rumourmongering and/or "gut feelings". Personally, I'd be interested to hear a gay man's views on this. Why? Because everyone in the debate is female, and the vast majority, if not all, are straight. Ever heard the term "gaydar"? Whose gaydar is more likely to be accurate - a straight female's or a homosexual male's? I know who I'd vote for...
READ MORE »